Thursday, December 1, 2011

NO on NEWT!- HYPOCRITE Is He

All who have been 'selling' Newt-because he is the Lesser of Two Evils (LOTE copy right Carol) --

I remind them that Newt can be seen sitting on a couch with Nancy P...among other hypocrisy !
even Rush has something to say about Newt! View-and give me your take--


I say-NO VOTE for the LOTE (copy-right-Carol)

10 comments:

Kid said...

Newt is a political whore. And very liberal. Has no problem with the global climate thing and really doesn't have any trouble with oblabebrcare.

What has he Promised to Do. That would be a sentence starting with the words "As President, I WILL.."
Ron Paul and Michele Bachmann are the only two to use those words convincingly.

Meaning I'm sure the sock puppet romney has uttered them, but he will say anything when you pull the string on his back.

Anyway... Incredible, Conservatives and 'republicans' have ragged on the liberals because they didn't do their research on obama, yet, they're willing to vote hook, line and sinker for anyone coming out saying anything that sounds conservative.
Makes me pessimistic on America's chances..

Leticia said...

I know that Cain is taking a lot of heat but I am still rooting for him and he is not quitting nor will I withdraw my support.

Newt, I am still on the fence with that one.

GW said...

Let's see, Newt was the architect of the Contract with America, welfare reform (compare the U.S. and U.K. welfare systems today), a balanced budget that cut spending and left the U.S. with a budget surplus, increases in spending for defense and CIA, and a significant growth in jobs. All of those were the high water marks of U.S. conservatism. Is there anyone else in politics today who can claim anything close to those bona fides?

Newt has many problems, but his strengths are great indeed. And he is the only viable alternative to Romney. Cain failed not because of his bimbo erruptions, but because his grasp of foreign policy was very poor. Perry failed because he was horrendous in the debates - and it is in the debates that our nation will choose between Obama our nominee. Bachman and Santorum just never got on for a variety of reasons.

I think that the nation would be well served by any of the current batch of candidates, but that only Romney and Gingrich have any sort of realistic shot at winning the nomination. Of the two, I prefer Gingrich. For those who are adamantly opposed to Gingrich, I would suggest watching the man in the debates and interviews. He is brilliant and his default position is conservative. He sometimes goes off the reservation when he thinks outside the box, but given all the problems we face, I can live with that.

GW said...

For what its worth - a discussion of all sides of the Newt issue:

http://wolfhowling.blogspot.com/2011/12/three-tales-of-newt.html

Jarheads Blog said...

Remeber this Carol ,there are no perfect candidates! Everyone of them has flaws. Only difference is that some are worse than others

They Say/We Say said...

Romney is on record as to saying that when he rises to a higher position he will tone down the idea of the conservatives strong position about abortions. That is why even I would take sell-out Newt on green positions---uuuukkk; a CFR-er and all that.
Even Bauchman is in on the elites somewhat.
YOU THINK THAT WE REALLY WILL BE ALLOWED TO PICK A REAL PRESIDENT!~?
NOT A Chance! The Revolution would have to be REAL BIG IN NUMBERS to do That; and Reagan was picked off in his first term--he survived though. Thank Yahueh!

Ron Russell said...

Newt would not be my first choice, but if he should win the nomination I will do all I can to help elect him---yes, the lesser of two evils.

republicanmother said...

If you all are still looking at the world through left/right glasses, you are not seeing the whole picture. Look at the funding. Who has funded Newt from his beginning? The Rockefeller-backed wing of the party, the Council on Foreign Relations etc.

Do you understand that these are just agents of the central banking cartel, The Federal Reserve? That's who is calling the shots in this country. They use tax-exempt foundations to do the social engineering (putting new "programs" in the schools, etc.) to get you to buy what they're selling.

When asked about his personal philosophy, Newt referred the questioner to Alvin Toffler, author of the Third Wave. I'll give you a taste of that:

Toffler penned a letter to America's "founding parents," in which he said: "The system of government you fashioned, including the principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented---a democracy for the 21st century."

Oh, and Newt wants to rethink our Constitution:
“The American challenge in leading the world is compounded by our Constitution,” he said. “Under our [constitutional system] — either we’re going to have to rethink our Constitution, or we’re going to have to rethink our process of decision-making.” He went on to profess an oxymoronic belief in “very strong but limited federal government,” and pledged, “I am for the United Nations.”

The lesser of two evils, huh?
I guess I'll vote for Judas over Herod. That makes complete sense. Forcing one to choose is not a valid free will choice. You're just playing along with Evil's farce of justice.

I will write in Ron Paul or vote liberatarian, and so will a lot of Democrats, yes democrats. Across both parties, AMERICANS are waking up to the scam of the central banking cartel.

The love of money TRULY is the root of all evil.

Z said...

am sending this to my friend who posted at my place about a Gingrich/Cain nomination........
Without RUsh, that could be trouble; and Rush will not change his opinion if Gingrich gets the nomination.

They say the Left wants to run against Gingrich; it won't be on platforms (Gingrich could crucify mr teleprompter in ANY debate) but it will be on Gingrich's lobbying, his female problems, his changing positions when the money's sweeter from another offer.

and, ugh, THE WIFE! :-)

christian soldier said...

K--Bachmann/Paul/and -after Huckabee's panel last night-Santorum...
That's it for me---

L-thank you for your take-

GW-your take is a good one-I'm just tired of the R elites giving us in the US the Dem lite---thank you for stopping by..

JB- there have to be some of the same ilk as our Founders-I'm waiting!
Thank you for your service and for stopping by...

TSWS-I'm afraid you are right and it really gets to me!--same ol-same ol...

RR-and we are getting tired of it 'aren't we!

RM-if a LOTE gets on the ballot-I - too- will be writing in---

Z-thank you for passing this on- the more who see it and be informed - the better we will be...
Thank